If you’re 40 or older without underlying health conditions, however, new research has found that small amounts of alcohol can reduce your risk of heart disease, stroke, and diabetes.
“Those diseases are the leading cause of death in a good part of the world,” said senior author Emmanuela Gakidou, a professor of health metrics science in the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation at the University of Washington School of Medicine.
“So when you look at the cumulative health effects, especially among older adults, it shows that a small amount is actually better for you than not drinking alcohol. For all the other reasons, it is at all levels of consumption. is harmful.”
In fact, the study found no protective effect for diseases such as tuberculosis, high blood pressure, atrial fibrillation, liver disease, epilepsy, pancreatitis, and several cancers.
“Wine guidelines, both global and national, have generally emphasized the difference between consumption levels for men compared to women,” Gakidou said. “Our work suggests that global guidelines, national guidelines and local guidelines will be more effective if they emphasize age as opposed to sex.”
“The findings underscore the importance of tailored wine recommendations to specific regions and populations,” Amanda Berger, vice president of science and health for the United States trade group Distilled Spirits Council, told CNN in an email.
“The important point is that no one should drink alcohol, and some individuals should not drink at all, to get the potential health benefits.”
People under 40 found to be at highest risk
The analysis estimates that 1.34 billion people worldwide consumed harmful amounts of alcohol in 2020. More than 59% of those who drank unsafe amounts of alcohol were between 15 and 39. More than two-thirds were male.
In each geographic area, the study found that drinking alcohol does not provide any health benefits for people under 40, but does increase the risk of injury, such as motor vehicle accidents, suicides and homicides.
The study defined a standard drink as 10 grams of pure alcohol, a small 3.4-fluid ounce (100-mL) glass of red wine, a 12-fluid-ounce (355-mL) standard can or bottle of beer (3.5% alcohol). ) Maybe. ) or a 1-fluid ounce shot (30 ml) of spirit that is 40% alcohol by volume.
critique of the conclusion
Praising the analysis as being well-conducted, some experts expressed concern about the study’s findings for not being involved in the research.
Colin Angus, a senior research fellow at the University of Sheffield Alcohol Research Group in the UK, said the data showed “14 times more alcohol-related deaths in 70-74-year-olds than in 20-24-year-olds in the UK.” Is.” In a statement from Sheffield. The data “refute the claim in this new study that we should focus on drinking in younger age groups,” Angus said.
“The elephant in the room with this study is the interpretation of risk based on cardiovascular disease outcomes – especially in older people,” said Dr Tony Rao, Clinical Research Fellow in the Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience at King’s College. London.
“We know that any perceived health benefits on the heart and circulation from alcohol are balanced by an increased risk from other conditions such as cancer, liver disease and mental disorders such as depression and dementia,” Rao said in a statement.
“The recommendation that people under 40 should not drink at all is completely unrealistic,” Matt Lambert, CEO of the Portman Group, the industry-funded group that regulates alcohol marketing in the UK, said in an email.
Senior author of the study Gakidou acknowledged that “it is not realistic to think that young adults will stop drinking. Still, we think it is important to communicate the latest evidence so that everyone can make informed decisions about their health.” “
For people over the age of 65, any increase in drinking is worrisome because many older adults “use drugs that may interact with alcohol, have health conditions that may be aggravated by alcoholism, and alcoholism.” may be susceptible to related falls and other accidental injuries,” the NIAA said.
“It’s a high threshold to be able to say that alcohol is an effective prevention therapy, and the studies so far don’t reach that limit. If they did, you can be sure the beverage industry would apply to the FDA.” . a licence,” said Dr Nick Sharon, Professor in the Department of Hepatology at the University of Southampton, UK.
‘A more detailed and nuanced analysis’
“What we have done in this new study is a more detailed and nuanced analysis of 21 different world regions,” Gakidou said. “What we’ve been able to do now is break it down: Who is alcohol harmful for? What is alcohol beneficial for? That’s why the message is varying, but it’s really consistent with what we’ve said before. .
“If you ask me, ‘Will the message be different in 10 years?’ Maybe. Chances are new evidence will emerge.” “It might change our thinking.”