Half of the patients were given the polypill that included aspirin, ramipril and atorvastatin, while the others received the usual standard of care. Patients were followed for an average of three years.
The researchers found 48 cardiovascular deaths in the polypill group and 71 in the usual care group, meaning that patients taking the polypill had a relative risk reduction of 33% for cardiovascular death. The polypill was also favorable in other measures studied in the trial, such as stroke or myocardial infarction.
The polypill and trial comes after 15 years of work, Fuster said. He and his colleagues decided that one of the main problems in medicine is the lack of adherence to the medications they are taking, especially in the cardiovascular area and especially in heart attack patients.
“It looks like we have a tremendous type of device, a simple polypill, which is actually much better,” Fuster said. “Perhaps most of this is due to better adherence, because it is a simple drug, with great results and the effect is as good or even better than that of aspirin in the past.”
He said it was noteworthy that the two curves — those who took a polypill and those who received standard care — diverged from the beginning and diverged as the years passed, meaning that it felt like the study went on for a long time “and even more striking” results.
Fuster said the polypill is something that could have a “very significant” impact on the general population.
The research has some limitations, including that the trial was not done indiscriminately and that all patients were enrolled prior to the COVID-19 pandemic.
(This story has not been edited by seemayo staff and is published from a rss feed)